The people that participated in the study shown one to sexting is riskier for ladies than for men
There’s also a measurement out of strength within practice, while the, taking on Segato (2016) , from the symbolic appropriation of the ladies partners’ bodies, they may be able prove their electricity and stay verified because of the its co-workers. Although not, the fact it is a kind of stamina do it really does not mean that it is not lovely. Once the Kennedy (2016) explains, in our patriarchal neighborhood, you will find a keen “eroticization regarding men control” which makes strategies one replicate types of control charming for group.
Besides the newest motivations having asking for, giving and you may forwarding a photograph are different for men and you can people, but in addition the outcomes of doing so. Organization otherwise adult discourses will focus on the greater number of dramatic dangers of it behavior including committing suicide, anxiety otherwise jail. Due to this it’s important to hear him or her and you will know the way it live and you may understand these problems.
Overall, people who took part in the analysis know sexting due to the fact a practice which involves dangers. Although not, there are even differences by sex. For males, stepping into sexting offers the lowest degree of risk. If they inquire about, upload, display or just located images or video clips, they often exercise in the place of significant effects. It has regarding new cumulative character of your own practice, which allows responsibility to-be diluted and you may causes it to be tough to identify exactly who started this new movement of one’s articles.
A first grader sent a video clip for which you may see everything, a buddy displayed they in my opinion, but they all had it. It absolutely was a giant state, the parents arrived klicka för att läsa mer, it said things towards cops and that they create expel the woman. [While the son exactly who sent it, did they actually do almost anything to your?]. Zero, it’s just that they failed to know just who she sent it so you can, all of them got it. I am not sure once they understood and you can didn’t state some thing, I don’t know (W, step three rd stages, private high-school, Morelia).
Additionally, you can find fewer cases of boys sending images or clips from their unique bodies, and those who take action, face particular outcomes for example being generated fun away from by its co-worker, but their masculinity, otherwise their value while the a man, is not expected.
In my own secondary school it performed takes place [you to men sent pictures]; specific relatives started a visibility just like the a female, posted photographs it found on the Internet and you may additional a pal regarding mine. In addition they keep in touch with your the like, and you may delivered your a package, however it try most of the phony and he felt it and you can sent him or her photos off your too, away from his manhood, are obvious. In addition they delivered those through WhatsApp to all the all of our loved ones. It had been a great time, the guy performed rating annoyed, then again he got regarding it (Yards, dos nd grade, societal high school, Mexico Urban area).
On top of that, it contrasts toward work from the some municipal teams to increase good sense one of teenagers and educate them to practice “safe sexting”, among the advice is always to hide that person and you will people determining scratching
The very best chance they recognized are “are burned”, that is, being called a “whore”. This “reputational chance” ( Injury, Fitch & Tolman, 2011 ) works due to the fact a collective approve to manage ladies sex. To be burned is going to be in public places thought to be a person who transgressed gender norms you to definitely imagine a contained, not apparent, females sexuality. Simultaneously, “the fresh new figure of one’s whore” acts as a regulating views for all female, just just in case you violated the norm, since they most of the learn what exactly is incorrect accomplish at the debts ones who will be sanctioned getting doing this ( Jones, 2010 ).